The best things in life are those that bring out the meaningfulness of life. Father’s Day is a day that people can be enriched by such symbolic moments that reflect reality in order to better appreciate it—when men go to church with their family, fire up grills, walk and talk with their wives, and play […]

On this Sunday, dedicated to honoring fathers, the Church has a powerful opportunity—not only to offer thanks for the men who give life, guidance, and protection to their families—but to renew our understanding of the irreplaceable role fathers play in passing on the Catholic Faith. The Catholic Church has long understood the family as a […]

Jesus never used the word “Trinity,” yet today He describes why believe in it. Gospel (Read Jn. 16:12-15) “Jesus said to His disciples:  ‘I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear it now.  But when He comes, the Spirit of truth, He will guide you to all truth.”  This is such a […]

ENCOUNTERING THE WORD — YOUR DAILY BIBLE VERSES “But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, to show that the transcendent power belongs to God and not to us.” – 2 Corinthians 4:7 Please help spread the Gospel. Share this verse with family and friends on Facebook and other social media. We need your support… […]

The post Your Daily Bible Verses — 2 Corinthians 4:7 appeared first on Integrated Catholic Life™.

St. Anthony of Padua was born in 1195 in Lisbon, Portugal. As a young man, he joined the Augustinian Canons but later became a Franciscan after being inspired by the martyrdom of Franciscans in Morocco. A gifted preacher and profound theologian, he was known for his deep knowledge of Scripture and his powerful, compassionate sermons […]

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jun 12, 2025 / 18:08 pm (CNA).

A parental rights group has filed formal complaints against the YMCA with three federal agencies, requesting an investigation of the organization for allegedly violating the law by permitting biological males to use girls’ locker rooms, bathrooms, and overnight cabins.

The American Parents Coalition (APC), led by Alleigh Marré, sent letters on June 10 to the secretaries of the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. She requested an investigation into possible Title IX violations on the part of the YMCA.

“The YMCA has betrayed the families it claims to serve,” Marré said in a statement. “Girls are expected to share teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and overnight cabins with biological males, while parents are often kept in the dark.”

“As a federally funded institution receiving more than 600 million taxpayer dollars, the YMCA is legally obligated to protect girls, not sacrifice fairness, safety, and privacy to promote gender ideology,” she added.

The APC alleges that because the YMCA is a recipient of federal funds, it is required to adhere to Title IX rules, which ban sex-based discrimination. President Donald Trump issued executive orders clarifying that federal anti-discrimination rules are based on a person’s “sex” and not self-purported “gender identity,” instructing agencies to safeguard “intimate spaces” reserved for girls and women such as locker rooms and bathrooms.

The APC accuses the YMCA of maintaining “discriminatory policies” that go against Title IX rules and “imperil vulnerable children.” It alleges the YMCA embraces “radical gender ideology” through its policies.

“Under such an ideology, a man can walk into a YMCA locker room where young girls are changing because he feels like a woman,” the complaint alleges. “The YMCA policies prioritize the man but not the young girls in the locker room.”

The letter cites a since-deleted 2017 document on the American YMCA’s website about “how to create a safe space for LGBTQ+ campers.” One of the recommendations in the document was to “ensure all campers and staff have access to the facilities aligned with their gender identity and comfort within facility and resource limitations” as opposed to separating facilities on the basis of biological sex.

Marré told CNA that these recommendations are not “just theoretical” and cited examples in which YMCA facilities forced women and girls to “share that space with a man.”

In 2022, an 80-year-old woman was banned from a YMCA pool in Washington after expressing concerns about a biological male being present in a female locker room while young girls were changing. An article from the Daily Mail this week detailed an ongoing dispute at a YMCA gym in California in which several women have complained about a biological male who frequently uses the female locker room.

In April, police in Missouri launched an investigation into reports that a biological male exposed himself to children in a girls’ locker room at North Kansas City YMCA. North Kansas City YMCA told the local Fox affiliate that it was cooperating with the investigation but that “individuals are allowed to use the locker room or restroom that they identify with” according to state and local law.

Some YMCA summer camps include information on their websites that state that facilities are separated on the basis of self-asserted “gender identity” rather than biological sex. Camp Olson in Minnesota, for example, states that cabin assignments are based on “gender preference.”

YMCA disputes APC’s letter

The YMCA is disputing some of the APC letter’s characterizations of its policies.

A spokesperson for the YMCA dismissed the now-deleted 2017 document about separating facilities on the basis of gender identity as simply a “blog” that “had a number of ideas for camps that were interested in being more inclusive,” telling CNA this was never a mandatory policy.

“Y-USA does not have a nationwide policy around locker room and bathroom facilities,” according to an official statement from the YMCA provided to CNA.

“State laws about transgender inclusion in gendered spaces remain an ever-evolving topic,” the statement added. “Considering this, Y-USA advocates for the personal safety and privacy of all members and participants.”

Marré told CNA that the YMCA’s response is “insufficient” and criticized the American YMCA for quietly removing the 2017 document and several other webpages that discuss gender ideology and homosexual pride without providing a public explanation or officially revising its policy.

“Until they explicitly say that their locker rooms, private spaces, and sports teams are [separated based on] biological sex, we have no reason to believe that’s actually the case,” Marré said.

Marré said the YMCA should “respect and follow Title IX as it is written,” but if the organization chooses not to, it should not “delete those policies” from its website but instead should “clearly communicate [it] to [its] members.”

APC is urging parents to question local YMCAs about their policies before allowing their children to participate in activities there. The organization has provided sample questions to help parents inquire about gender-related policies.

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jun 12, 2025 / 18:08 pm (CNA).

A parental rights group has filed formal complaints against the YMCA with three federal agencies, requesting an investigation of the organization for allegedly violating the law by permitting biological males to use girls’ locker rooms, bathrooms, and overnight cabins.

The American Parents Coalition (APC), led by Alleigh Marré, sent letters on June 10 to the secretaries of the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. She requested an investigation into possible Title IX violations on the part of the YMCA.

“The YMCA has betrayed the families it claims to serve,” Marré said in a statement. “Girls are expected to share teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and overnight cabins with biological males, while parents are often kept in the dark.”

“As a federally funded institution receiving more than 600 million taxpayer dollars, the YMCA is legally obligated to protect girls, not sacrifice fairness, safety, and privacy to promote gender ideology,” she added.

The APC alleges that because the YMCA is a recipient of federal funds, it is required to adhere to Title IX rules, which ban sex-based discrimination. President Donald Trump issued executive orders clarifying that federal anti-discrimination rules are based on a person’s “sex” and not self-purported “gender identity,” instructing agencies to safeguard “intimate spaces” reserved for girls and women such as locker rooms and bathrooms.

The APC accuses the YMCA of maintaining “discriminatory policies” that go against Title IX rules and “imperil vulnerable children.” It alleges the YMCA embraces “radical gender ideology” through its policies.

“Under such an ideology, a man can walk into a YMCA locker room where young girls are changing because he feels like a woman,” the complaint alleges. “The YMCA policies prioritize the man but not the young girls in the locker room.”

The letter cites a since-deleted 2017 document on the American YMCA’s website about “how to create a safe space for LGBTQ+ campers.” One of the recommendations in the document was to “ensure all campers and staff have access to the facilities aligned with their gender identity and comfort within facility and resource limitations” as opposed to separating facilities on the basis of biological sex.

Marré told CNA that these recommendations are not “just theoretical” and cited examples in which YMCA facilities forced women and girls to “share that space with a man.”

In 2022, an 80-year-old woman was banned from a YMCA pool in Washington after expressing concerns about a biological male being present in a female locker room while young girls were changing. An article from the Daily Mail this week detailed an ongoing dispute at a YMCA gym in California in which several women have complained about a biological male who frequently uses the female locker room.

In April, police in Missouri launched an investigation into reports that a biological male exposed himself to children in a girls’ locker room at North Kansas City YMCA. North Kansas City YMCA told the local Fox affiliate that it was cooperating with the investigation but that “individuals are allowed to use the locker room or restroom that they identify with” according to state and local law.

Some YMCA summer camps include information on their websites that state that facilities are separated on the basis of self-asserted “gender identity” rather than biological sex. Camp Olson in Minnesota, for example, states that cabin assignments are based on “gender preference.”

YMCA disputes APC’s letter

The YMCA is disputing some of the APC letter’s characterizations of its policies.

A spokesperson for the YMCA dismissed the now-deleted 2017 document about separating facilities on the basis of gender identity as simply a “blog” that “had a number of ideas for camps that were interested in being more inclusive,” telling CNA this was never a mandatory policy.

“Y-USA does not have a nationwide policy around locker room and bathroom facilities,” according to an official statement from the YMCA provided to CNA.

“State laws about transgender inclusion in gendered spaces remain an ever-evolving topic,” the statement added. “Considering this, Y-USA advocates for the personal safety and privacy of all members and participants.”

Marré told CNA that the YMCA’s response is “insufficient” and criticized the American YMCA for quietly removing the 2017 document and several other webpages that discuss gender ideology and homosexual pride without providing a public explanation or officially revising its policy.

“Until they explicitly say that their locker rooms, private spaces, and sports teams are [separated based on] biological sex, we have no reason to believe that’s actually the case,” Marré said.

Marré said the YMCA should “respect and follow Title IX as it is written,” but if the organization chooses not to, it should not “delete those policies” from its website but instead should “clearly communicate [it] to [its] members.”

APC is urging parents to question local YMCAs about their policies before allowing their children to participate in activities there. The organization has provided sample questions to help parents inquire about gender-related policies.

CNA Staff, Jun 12, 2025 / 17:38 pm (CNA).

Twenty-two states and various religious freedom and free speech advocates have filed friend-of-the-court briefs on behalf of two Vermont couples who are suing the state after their licenses to be foster parents were revoked due to their religious beliefs concerning human sexuality. 

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) is suing on behalf of Brian and Katy Wuoti and Bryan and Rebecca Gantt after the Vermont Department for Children and Families informed the two families that their belief that persons cannot change biological sex and that marriage is only between a man and a woman precluded them from serving as foster parents in the state.

Despite describing the Wuotis and the Gantts as “amazing,” “wonderful,” and “welcoming,” state officials revoked the couples’ foster care licenses after they expressed their commonly-held and constitutionally-protected religious beliefs. The state said these beliefs made them “unqualified” to parent any child, regardless of the child’s age, beliefs, or identity. 

In 2014, the Wuotis became foster parents, eventually adopting two brothers from foster care. The Gantts started fostering in 2016, caring for children born with drug dependencies or fetal alcohol syndrome, and have adopted three children.

Attorneys general from 21 states and the Arizona Legislature filed an amicus curiae, or friend-of-the-court brief, on June 6 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on behalf of the families, writing that the state is burdening the couples’ “free speech and free exercise rights.”

In another friend-of-the-court brief, The Conscience Project director Andrea Picciotti-Bayer decried Vermont’s “ideological intolerance,” writing that Vermont’s stance is “nothing other than an ideological snare set to identify and exclude anyone — especially those with religious convictions — unwilling to embrace gender ideology.”

Picciotti-Bayer told CNA that the Vermont policy is especially egregious because there is a tremendous need for foster families in the state and nationwide. Because of the huge shortage, Picciotti-Bayer said children are being placed in “crazy situations” like hotels and sheriff’s offices.

She criticized the Vermont Department for Children and Families, saying the state’s “priorities are so far off,” because excluding Christian families like the Wuotis and the Gantts prevents foster children from “finding safe, loving, and stable homes.”

ADF Senior Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse agreed, saying in a statement that “Vermont’s foster-care system is in crisis: There aren’t enough families to care for vulnerable kids. Yet instead of inviting families from diverse backgrounds to help care for vulnerable kids, Vermont is shutting the door on them, putting its ideological agenda ahead of the needs of suffering kids.”

According to Picciotti-Bayer, Christians have an “incredible track record in fostering,” saying Christian families are more likely than the general population to foster and are also more likely to foster more complex placements.

“Hard-to-place kids often find the best homes in families of faith,” Picciotti-Bayer told CNA, because of the “deep bench of community support” found in churches and faith communities, who support foster families by providing food, clothes, and respite support. 

“When you know these Christian families make stellar foster families,” she continued, “for the state to categorically exclude them seems nonsensical, apart from the possibility of grave discrimination.”

A friend-of-the-court brief was also filed by Concerned Women for America, the First Liberty Institute, the Foundation for Moral Law, and professors Mark Regnerus, Catherine Pakaluk, Loren Marks, and Joseph Price.

A friend-of-the-court brief was even filed by the left-leaning Women’s Liberation Front, whose attorney, Lauren Bone, wrote that “gender ideology is religious in nature,” and mandating that foster parents adopt such ideology is akin to an “unconstitutional establishment of religion.”  

Bone also wrote that gender ideology, rather than being “progressive,” is actually a “regressive approach to sex stereotypes and sexuality” that “harms children, women, and LGB [lesbian, gay, and bisexual] people” by “leading often troubled children to question their sex, by subverting the basis for necessary sex separation, and by confounding the meaning of same-sex attraction.”

CNA Staff, Jun 12, 2025 / 17:38 pm (CNA).

Twenty-two states and various religious freedom and free speech advocates have filed friend-of-the-court briefs on behalf of two Vermont couples who are suing the state after their licenses to be foster parents were revoked due to their religious beliefs concerning human sexuality. 

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) is suing on behalf of Brian and Katy Wuoti and Bryan and Rebecca Gantt after the Vermont Department for Children and Families informed the two families that their belief that persons cannot change biological sex and that marriage is only between a man and a woman precluded them from serving as foster parents in the state.

Despite describing the Wuotis and the Gantts as “amazing,” “wonderful,” and “welcoming,” state officials revoked the couples’ foster care licenses after they expressed their commonly-held and constitutionally-protected religious beliefs. The state said these beliefs made them “unqualified” to parent any child, regardless of the child’s age, beliefs, or identity. 

In 2014, the Wuotis became foster parents, eventually adopting two brothers from foster care. The Gantts started fostering in 2016, caring for children born with drug dependencies or fetal alcohol syndrome, and have adopted three children.

Attorneys general from 21 states and the Arizona Legislature filed an amicus curiae, or friend-of-the-court brief, on June 6 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on behalf of the families, writing that the state is burdening the couples’ “free speech and free exercise rights.”

In another friend-of-the-court brief, The Conscience Project director Andrea Picciotti-Bayer decried Vermont’s “ideological intolerance,” writing that Vermont’s stance is “nothing other than an ideological snare set to identify and exclude anyone — especially those with religious convictions — unwilling to embrace gender ideology.”

Picciotti-Bayer told CNA that the Vermont policy is especially egregious because there is a tremendous need for foster families in the state and nationwide. Because of the huge shortage, Picciotti-Bayer said children are being placed in “crazy situations” like hotels and sheriff’s offices.

She criticized the Vermont Department for Children and Families, saying the state’s “priorities are so far off,” because excluding Christian families like the Wuotis and the Gantts prevents foster children from “finding safe, loving, and stable homes.”

ADF Senior Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse agreed, saying in a statement that “Vermont’s foster-care system is in crisis: There aren’t enough families to care for vulnerable kids. Yet instead of inviting families from diverse backgrounds to help care for vulnerable kids, Vermont is shutting the door on them, putting its ideological agenda ahead of the needs of suffering kids.”

According to Picciotti-Bayer, Christians have an “incredible track record in fostering,” saying Christian families are more likely than the general population to foster and are also more likely to foster more complex placements.

“Hard-to-place kids often find the best homes in families of faith,” Picciotti-Bayer told CNA, because of the “deep bench of community support” found in churches and faith communities, who support foster families by providing food, clothes, and respite support. 

“When you know these Christian families make stellar foster families,” she continued, “for the state to categorically exclude them seems nonsensical, apart from the possibility of grave discrimination.”

A friend-of-the-court brief was also filed by Concerned Women for America, the First Liberty Institute, the Foundation for Moral Law, and professors Mark Regnerus, Catherine Pakaluk, Loren Marks, and Joseph Price.

A friend-of-the-court brief was even filed by the left-leaning Women’s Liberation Front, whose attorney, Lauren Bone, wrote that “gender ideology is religious in nature,” and mandating that foster parents adopt such ideology is akin to an “unconstitutional establishment of religion.”  

Bone also wrote that gender ideology, rather than being “progressive,” is actually a “regressive approach to sex stereotypes and sexuality” that “harms children, women, and LGB [lesbian, gay, and bisexual] people” by “leading often troubled children to question their sex, by subverting the basis for necessary sex separation, and by confounding the meaning of same-sex attraction.”

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jun 12, 2025 / 17:08 pm (CNA).

French President Emmanuel Macron has joined other European and North American leaders in a call for age verification requirements for social media.